Research Note Researched

Kansas — 287(g) Explosion and HB 2372 Veto Override

Overview

Kansas has seen one of the sharpest 287(g) expansions in the country — from 3 agreements in January 2025 to 20+ by November 2025, with the state legislature then passing a law (over the governor’s veto) that requires sheriffs to honor ICE detainers and lets them sign 287(g) agreements without county commissioner approval.

The 287(g) Explosion

Timeline

Pre-2025: Only 2-3 Kansas agencies had 287(g) agreements (Finney and Jackson counties signed in 2020)
March 2025: KCUR reported many Kansas law enforcement agencies still “don’t want to help with deportations”
November 2025: 20 Kansas law enforcement agencies signed agreements with ICE, including:
- Sedgwick County (Wichita): Warrant Service Officer model — 1 deputy trained, 167 ICE holds Jan-Oct 2025
- Shawnee County (Topeka): Task Force model — 6 deputies trained (July 2, 2025), one of only 2 Kansas agencies at this level
- Brown County: All three models — Jail Enforcement, Task Force, AND Warrant Service Officer (Nov 4-5, 2025)
- Finney County (Garden City): Warrant Service Officer model
- Kansas Bureau of Investigation: Task Force model — 3 state agents authorized

Three Models

Warrant Service Officer (most common in KS): 4 hours of training, can issue admin warrants for jail inmates
Task Force (Shawnee Co, KBI): Deputies work alongside ICE agents on enforcement operations
Jail Enforcement: Officers screen inmates for immigration violations

Financial Incentives (effective October 1, 2025)

Salary reimbursement: Full annual salary + benefits for each trained 287(g) officer
Overtime: Up to 25% of annual salary
Performance bounties: Up to $1,000 per officer per quarter for locating undocumented immigrants
Equipment: Up to $7,500/officer for laptops, phones, cellular service
Vehicle purchases: Up to $100,000 for qualified agencies

HB 2372: The Legislative Lockdown

What It Does

Senate Substitute for House Bill 2372 is a comprehensive ICE cooperation law:

Mandatory ICE detainer compliance: Sheriffs operating county jails must honor ICE detainer requests (removes optional participation)
287(g) independence: Sheriffs can sign 287(g) agreements without county commissioner approval, exempting these from interlocal cooperation act
25-foot rule: Criminalizes being within 25 feet of ICE agents or first responders during operations after warning — up to $1,000 fine and 6 months jail
Liability shield: Good-faith immunity from state civil liability; state attorney general provides legal representation for federal actions; municipal insurance pools must cover officers
No time limit removed: Earlier version had 48-hour detainer cap; final version removed this but requires release if ICE cancels or citizenship is proven

Legislative History

March 19, 2026: Senate passed 31-9
April 8, 2026: Governor Laura Kelly vetoed — cited First Amendment concerns, increased liability for local governments, removal of county commission oversight
April 9, 2026: Legislature overrode veto — House 85-38, Senate 31-9 (both clearing 2/3 threshold)

Opposition

Gov. Kelly: “This legislation poses a myriad of legal concerns… would increase liability exposure, increase costs, and remove local control”
Sen. Cindy Holscher (D-Overland Park): Cited civil rights concerns about detention without criminal charges
ACLU of Kansas: Called it an “attack on voters, immigrants, and due process for all”

Update — May 2026

Agreement count keeps climbing: As of spring 2026, the ICE 287(g) roster lists 28 Kansas sheriff offices and police departments with signed agreements — up from the ~20 reported in November 2025.
Liability time bomb: DHS has said it will not financially back sheriff’s departments if they are sued over immigration-detainer holds, even as the federal government faces a large volume of detainee lawsuits. Courts have held that a sheriff’s 287(g) agreement is not a defense to unlawful detention — “Jailers cannot evade responsibility for unlawful detention by claiming the federal government required them to hold the person.” HB 2372 shifts that exposure onto the state and municipal insurance pools it forces to cover officers, meaning Kansas taxpayers, not DHS, absorb the wrongful-detention risk.
Arrests soaring: ICE arrests in Kansas roughly doubled Trump-inauguration to mid-2025 and nearly tripled Jan–Oct 15, 2025 vs. the prior year, concentrated in Finney, Johnson, and Wyandotte counties. About half of Kansas ICE arrests under the crackdown are of people with no criminal conviction (vs. ~1 in 4 in the last 18 Biden months).

Pattern Recognition

Kansas follows the same pattern as Oklahoma and Utah: state legislature overriding local resistance to force 287(g) participation and ICE cooperation. The removal of county commissioner approval is particularly significant — it eliminates the democratic accountability layer that communities like Wyandotte County were using to block cooperation.

The bounty system ($1,000/quarter for locating immigrants) creates a direct financial incentive for officers to prioritize immigration enforcement over other duties.

Sources

Edit this entry Report an issue