Research Note Researched

Massachusetts — ICE enforcement overview 2025-2026

MA

Massachusetts Enforcement Pipeline Map

The Massachusetts ICE detention pipeline flows through four nodes:

ARREST → PROCESSING → DETENTION → FLIGHTS
(statewide)  (Burlington)  (Plymouth County)  (Hanscom Field)

1. Arrest Points

  • Courthouses: 614+ arrests in 2025 (Region 3 — Lawrence/Lynn/Waltham: 227; Region 5 — Chelsea/Boston: 136)
  • Police departments: 210+ arrests involving 32 local PDs (notably Lawrence and Boston)
  • Streets and communities: at-large arrests statewide
  • County jails: 89+ arrests across 8 of 13 county jails (Jan-Oct 2024 data)

2. Processing: Burlington Field Office

  • 1000 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803 (Middlesex County)
  • 42,000 sq ft office building, New England ICE HQ
  • De facto detention — conditions documented as “abysmal” by multiple congressional visitors
  • ICE claims 72-hour max; advocates document 10+ day holds

3. Detention: Plymouth County Correctional Facility

  • 26 Long Pond Road, Plymouth, MA 02360 (Plymouth County)
  • 526 beds, $215/day, IGSA through 2029
  • Average daily population: 414-449 (FY2025)
  • 85% classified “no ICE threat”
  • Only remaining county ICE detention site in MA

4. Transportation: Hanscom Field

  • Bedford, MA (Middlesex County)
  • 114+ ICE charter flights through Nov 2025 (2x previous year)
  • Governor demanded ICE stop; Massport says it cannot legally refuse federal flights
  • Also used: Portsmouth/Pease (NH), Burlington International (VT), Tweed New Haven (CT)

Key Statistics

MetricValuePeriod
Total ICE arrests7,030+Trump admin first 15 months
vs. Biden period1,470Final 415 days
Courthouse arrests614+2025
vs. prior year2822024
Plymouth detainees449 avg/dayFY2025
No criminal charges46%Trump-era arrests
Hanscom flights114+Through Nov 2025
DOC 287(g) transfers78-172/yrAnnual average since 2009
Countries of origin100Arrest data

Key Players

State Government

  • Gov. Maura Healey: Executive orders limiting ICE, but preserved DOC 287(g); demanded Hanscom stop; launched misconduct portal
  • AG Andrea Campbell: ICE misconduct reporting portal (March 2026)
  • Rep. Judith Garcia / Rep. Andy Vargas: PROTECT Act leads

Federal

  • Sen. Ed Markey: Multiple Burlington visits, demanded answers from ICE
  • Rep. Seth Moulton: Burlington oversight visits (June, December 2025)
  • Rep. Jim McGovern: Unannounced Burlington visit April 8, 2026

County

  • Plymouth County Sheriff: Maintains IGSA, $35M+/yr revenue
  • Bristol County Sheriff Paul Heroux: Information firewall policy Nov 2025
  • Thomas Hodgson (former Bristol County): Now at DHS/ICE under Trump

Municipal

  • Mayor Michelle Wu (Boston): Banned ICE from city property Feb 2026
  • Cambridge, Somerville: Following Boston’s lead
  • Somerville, Chelsea: Filed lawsuits against federal defunding threats

The 287(g) Landscape

Massachusetts has a single 287(g) agreement — the DOC statewide prison system (since 2007). Unlike most states where 287(g) has exploded, MA has resisted new agreements:

  • Healey’s EO 650 bans new 287(g) without public safety need
  • PROTECT Act would codify limits
  • Safe Communities Act (S.1681) would ban all 287(g)
  • But Healey explicitly defends the existing DOC agreement

Contrast with neighboring New Hampshire: 12 of 13 New England 287(g) agreements are in NH.

Heatmap Correlation

The heatmap signals for MA counties reflect the historical IGSA and 287(g) infrastructure:

  • Suffolk (score 47): Former IGSA (ended 2019), 287(g) history
  • Essex (score 37): Region 3 courthouse arrest epicenter (Lawrence, Lynn)
  • Middlesex (score 37): Burlington field office + Hanscom Field location
  • Barnstable (score 27): Cape Cod, 287(g) signals
  • Bristol (score 27): Former Hodgson detention center (ended 2021)
  • Hampden (score 27): Springfield — DA office communicating with ICE

Notable absence from heatmap: Plymouth County (FIPS 25023) — which has the only active IGSA and 526 ICE beds — is NOT in the provided heatmap signals, suggesting the heatmap may undercount actual detention infrastructure.

Comparison to Other Blue States

Massachusetts is the only state where a Democratic governor explicitly defends a 287(g) agreement while simultaneously passing executive orders limiting ICE. This makes it a unique case study:

  • New York: Governor opposes all 287(g)
  • New Jersey: Three new sanctuary laws, 287(g) ban codified
  • California: AB1633 50% tax on private detention
  • Illinois: Way Forward Act blocks county cooperation
  • Oregon: Sanctuary since 1987
  • Massachusetts: Governor says she “supports” the 287(g) agreement to get “bad guys off the streets”
Edit this entry Report an issue
Last updated: Apr 12, 2026