Research Note Researched

Nevada — 287(g) expansion from 0 to 4+ jurisdictions in 2025

NV

Overview

Nevada went from zero active 287(g) agreements at the start of 2025 to four or more by year’s end, part of a Mountain West-wide fivefold increase (10 to 54 agreements across seven states). Nevada’s expansion is distinctive because the largest agreement (LVMPD/Clark County) is now the subject of a state Supreme Court challenge over whether Nevada law even permits 287(g) participation.

Agreements by County

CountyFIPSJurisdictionTypeSignedNotes
Douglas32005Douglas County SheriffWarrant Service OfficerFeb 2025First NV jurisdiction in years; sheriff clarified no field enforcement
Clark32003LVMPDWarrant Service OfficerJun 2025Largest by volume; ACLU lawsuit; 633+ ICE arrests through Oct 2025
Mineral32021Mineral County SheriffWSO (active) + Task Force (pending)2025Only NV jurisdiction pursuing task force model
Lyon32019Lyon County SheriffWSO (finalizing)Mid-2025Sheriff says patrol deputies will NOT arrest on immigration status alone

Mountain West Context

Signed 287(g) agreements across the Mountain West rose from 10 to 54 in 2025. Nationally, ICE has signed 1,645 Memorandums of Agreement covering 39 states and 2 U.S. territories as of April 2026.

The Mineral County Anomaly

Mineral County (FIPS 32021, heatmap score 12) is the only Nevada jurisdiction pursuing the task force model — the more aggressive version that allows deputies to conduct immigration enforcement in the field. This is notable for a tiny, budget-distressed county (pop ~4,500). The warrant service officer model only allows serving warrants inside the jail.

All four agreements face potential disruption if the Nevada Supreme Court rules in the ACLU’s favor that AB376 prohibits local agencies from entering 287(g) deals. The district court never reached this question. A ruling could force termination of all four agreements.

Sources

Edit this entry Report an issue
Last updated: Apr 13, 2026