Start Here → Map Fights Pipeline Tactics Investigate Counties By State By Signal Type Timeline Players Network Facilities FOIA Generator Help Build Contribute Coverage Gaps Data Sources Develop Resources Methodology
County Fight Contested

Bradford County FL — 3,000-Bed IGSA Facility on Contaminated Site

Bradford, Florida
Vote: 3-2 (Jan 15, 2026) to advance proposal
Current status: Ongoing. April 7, 2026 BOCC agenda includes both FDEP environmental monitoring agreement AND lease for 'temporary ICE detainment facility' — lease before studies complete.

The Fight

Bradford County is the documented case study of the county-led IGSA model — where a consulting firm (Sabot Consulting) staffed by former ICE officials pitches rural sheriffs on building detention facilities as economic development. See bradford-county-douglas-building for the facility entry. The fight is ongoing.

What Makes This Different

Unlike federal warehouse purchases (where the government buys property and bypasses local processes), the IGSA model goes through local democratic processes. The county commission votes. The sheriff holds the lease. The county retains the land. This makes it harder to fight with federal preemption arguments — but it also means the fight happens in public, at commission meetings, where residents can show up.

Timeline

  • July 2025: Sheriff Gordon Smith approached by former Osceola County Chief Deputy working with Sabot
  • December 16, 2025: Sabot briefing package prepared (12 pages, marked DRAFT)
  • January 15, 2026: Commission votes 3-2 to advance (Spooner and Riddick opposed)
  • January 30, 2026: Community protest
  • February 28, 2026: WUFT reports 15 years of VOC groundwater contamination spreading to 30 properties
  • March 3, 2026: Sheriff’s report to commission — dismisses opposition as “hate-filled vigor”
  • April 6, 2026: The RAMM publishes “The Blueprint for America’s Detention Camps” based on leaked Sabot documents
  • April 7, 2026: BOCC agenda: FDEP site access agreement AND sheriff’s lease

Environmental Issue

The Douglas Building site has VOC-contaminated groundwater monitored by FDEP for 15 years. The Sabot proposal lists “vapor intrusion” as a risk. The lease is on the agenda before the environmental studies are complete — contradicting the Sheriff’s March 3 assurance.

The Arguments

For (Sheriff Smith): 1,250 jobs, $239M/year at full capacity, “creative” alternative to raising taxes, “we can do it the right way”

Against (residents, WWALS): Environmental contamination, proximity to community, lack of transparency, moral objections, the detainees are “human beings” being warehoused

Tactics

  • Sheriff framing opposition as political (“hate-filled vigor,” “misinformation”)
  • Sheriff personally attacking individual critics by name at commission meeting (Mr. Still)
  • Sheriff claiming outsiders (“from other areas around us”) don’t represent the county
  • Opponents using FOIA/public records, environmental data, protest, and national media attention

Sources

This research is published at The RAMM — investigative reporting on the detention pipeline.
Edit Report issue Add a tip about this fight
Last updated: Apr 6, 2026