County Fight Active-Litigation

Miami-Dade FL — Alligator Alcatraz Everglades Detention Fight

Miami-Dade, FL FIPS 12086

Current status: 11th Circuit ruled April 21, 2026 that NEPA does not apply because Florida (not the federal government) controls the facility, invalidating the preliminary injunction that had halted operations. Environmental and tribal NEPA litigation continues in district court before Judge Kathleen Williams. Separate ACLU class action (H.C.R. v. Noem) won a March 27, 2026 federal court order requiring ICE to provide legal counsel access to detainees.

The Fight

The Everglades Detention Facility — rapidly dubbed “Alligator Alcatraz” — is an immigration detention center built in the heart of the Florida Everglades, on the abandoned runways of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport inside Big Cypress National Preserve in Ochopee, Collier County. Miami-Dade County is a named defendant through its participation in the 287(g) enforcement agreement that underpins the facility’s operation.

Florida’s Division of Emergency Management spent approximately $218 million to erect the facility, which opened in July 2025 with capacity for 3,000 people (DHS has cited expansion potential to 5,000). The funding source is the central legal battleground: FEMA awarded Florida $608 million — the full amount Florida requested — to build and operate detention infrastructure, including this facility. Environmental and tribal plaintiffs argue this federal funding triggers mandatory environmental review under NEPA. The federal and state governments counter that Florida controls the facility, not the federal government.

The case has become the first circuit court ruling on post-2023 amendments to NEPA that narrowed the scope of projects requiring federal environmental review.

Timeline

2025-06-27: Friends of the Everglades, Center for Biological Diversity, and Miccosukee Tribe file federal lawsuit against DHS, ICE, Florida Division of Emergency Management, and Miami-Dade County; case assigned to U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams
2025-07: Facility opens for operation; immediately labeled “Alligator Alcatraz” by critics
2025-08: ACLU, ACLU of Florida, Community Justice Project, and National Immigrant Justice Center file class action H.C.R. v. Noem (Middle District of Florida, Case No. 25-cv-00765, Judge Sheri Polster Chappell) over denial of legal counsel access
2025-10-02: FEMA confirms $608 million grant to Florida for detention infrastructure; plaintiffs call the confirmation evidence supporting their NEPA lawsuit claims
2025-12-18: District court denies preliminary injunction in H.C.R. v. Noem without ruling on the 287(g) authorization question
2026-01: Former detainees testify before federal judge that facility agents did not respect rights to legal counsel; one detainee deported to Colombia, another to Haiti, before their cases resolved
2026-03-13: FEMA lifts an environmental hold it had placed on the $608M grant, releasing funds
2026-03-27: Judge Chappell grants a preliminary injunction in H.C.R. v. Noem requiring ICE and Florida FDEM to: (1) provide readily-available confidential outgoing legal calls to all detainees; (2) publish contact information so attorneys and detainees can reach each other; (3) continue allowing attorneys to visit without prescreening — certified as a class action covering all current and future detainees
2026-04-21: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit invalidates in a 2-1 decision the preliminary injunction that had been blocking facility operations; the majority holds that Florida — not the federal government — controls the facility, so NEPA’s federal-project environmental review requirement does not apply; dissent flags the ruling opens an environmental review loophole
2026-04-21: NEPA/environmental litigation continues in district court before Judge Kathleen Williams; the 11th Circuit ruling addressed only the injunction, not the merits

The NEPA Fight

The central legal question is whether $608 million in FEMA funding with no environmental review violates the National Environmental Policy Act. Plaintiffs — Friends of the Everglades, Center for Biological Diversity, and the Miccosukee Tribe — argue that federal funding and DHS involvement make this a federal action requiring an Environmental Impact Statement.

The government’s position: Florida erected and controls the facility; DHS merely uses it. The 11th Circuit majority accepted this framing, ruling the NEPA trigger question turns on who controls the project. Because Florida built and operates the facility under a state/DHS agreement, the majority found federal environmental review is not required.

Bloomberg Law noted the ruling “opens an environmental review loophole” — a template for routing federally-funded detention infrastructure through state control to avoid NEPA.

The ruling is the first circuit court interpretation of the 2023 Fiscal Responsibility Act amendments that narrowed NEPA’s scope, making it potentially precedent-setting for future detention facility fights nationwide.

Miccosukee Tribal Stakes

The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida joined the lawsuit as plaintiffs after the case was filed. Their claims center on pollution risks to their food and water supplies: the facility sits within the Big Cypress National Preserve, adjacent to tribal lands the Miccosukee have occupied for generations. The tribe argues the facility’s wastewater and runoff threaten the ecosystem that supports their subsistence practices.

As of late April 2026, the facility remained operational among what the Miccosukee describe as their sacred lands.

Legal Counsel Victory (H.C.R. v. Noem)

While the 11th Circuit handed environmental plaintiffs a setback, detainees won a significant access victory in a parallel case. The March 27, 2026 preliminary injunction in H.C.R. v. Noem requires ICE and Florida to provide confidential legal calls and attorney access to all current and future detainees — the first court-ordered legal access mandate at the facility. The order was certified as a class action.

Key Actors

Friends of the Everglades — lead plaintiff
Center for Biological Diversity — co-plaintiff
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida — co-plaintiff; sacred lands and food/water concerns
Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) — defendant; funded and built the facility
Miami-Dade County — defendant via 287(g) agreement
DHS / ICE — defendants
Judge Kathleen Williams — U.S. District Court; underlying NEPA case
Judge Sheri Polster Chappell — Middle District of Florida; H.C.R. v. Noem legal access case
11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals — ruled 2-1 April 21, 2026 against preliminary injunction
ACLU / ACLU of Florida / Community Justice Project / National Immigrant Justice Center — H.C.R. v. Noem counsel

Sources

This research is published at The RAMM — investigative reporting on the detention pipeline.

Edit Report issue County profile Add a tip about this fight