County Fight Won

Nye County NV — Terminated ICE contract over audit failures and funding gap

Nye, NV FIPS 32023
Current status: County voted 5-0 to terminate ICE contract Nov 2024; sheriff says 'no desire' to revive. Medical audit failures and $4M+/year general fund subsidy made deal unsustainable.

The Fight

Nye County held ICE detainees at the Nye County Detention Center in Pahrump under an IGSA from 2019 to November 2024. A failed federal audit, a medical provider crisis, and a growing gap between ICE payments and actual costs forced the county to end the deal. The county commission voted 5-0 to terminate on November 15, 2024. As of July 2025, Sheriff Joe McGill has stated the county has “no desire” to get back in with ICE.

Key Details

The financial trap:

  • ICE paid ~$2M/year
  • Actual costs rose from $6M (2020) to $8M (2024)
  • County pulled $4M+/year from its general fund to cover the gap
  • Former Commissioner Donna Cox: “I don’t think it’s to anybody’s advantage, except ICE”

The audit:

  • Summer 2024: ICE unannounced inspection found serious deficiencies
  • Dirty conditions (toilet paper on ceiling, repackaged medications, no potable water)
  • Medical staff failed to follow up on abnormal vital signs
  • Health records and medications not transferred when detainees moved
  • Phones in housing units couldn’t make outgoing calls, blocking legal access

The medical crisis:

  • County’s medical provider contract with Serenity Health fell through October 2024
  • New contract would cost $2.2M — more than $360K increase
  • With ICE only paying $2M total, the medical cost alone would exceed ICE revenue

Capacity: 75 ICE detainees among the facility’s 225 total beds; 60 ICE detainees at time of closure

Why It Matters

Nye County’s experience is a textbook case of the IGSA subsidy trap — small rural county lured by ICE revenue, ends up subsidizing federal immigration enforcement from its general fund. The audit findings (no potable water, blocked phone access) echo systemic conditions problems across the detention network. The 5-0 termination vote and the sheriff’s refusal to revive the deal suggest the county learned its lesson.

Sources

This research is published at The RAMM — investigative reporting on the detention pipeline.
Edit Report issue County profile Add a tip about this fight
Last updated: Apr 13, 2026