County Fight Contested

Sherburne MN — Largest MN ICE Detention Site Adds 287(g) JEM as Board Hesitates

Sherburne, MN FIPS 27141

Current status: Sheriff Joel Brott pursued a 287(g) Jail Enforcement Model agreement in 2025; per Minnesota Reformer (Nov 7, 2025) Sherburne is among 8 MN counties listed with active 287(g)s. Application paused after AG Ellison's Dec 12, 2025 opinion that only county boards can authorize. The 732-bed Sherburne County Jail is MN's largest ICE detention site (long-running IGSA, ~131-detainee 19-year average, peaked at 304/day in 2019; ~99 detainees as of 2025 per Unicorn Riot). At a Jan 20, 2026 board workshop, Commissioner Gregg Felber pressed for a board resolution endorsing 287(g) and ICE assistance — county attorney warned discussion risked open-meeting-law violation; County Administrator Bruce Messelt flagged legal risk; Felber retracted. Sustained outside pressure: weekly SARI vigils, ICOM 'End ICE Detention' campaign, Mar 8 multi-org rally at sheriff's office.

The Fight

Sherburne County Jail in Elk River — about 30 miles northwest of Minneapolis — is the largest ICE detention site in Minnesota and has been for nearly two decades. The 732-bed facility has averaged 131 ICE detainees per day across 19 years of an IGSA, peaking at 304/day in 2019 and bottoming out at ~2/day in 2023-2024 before climbing again under the second Trump administration (~99 detainees per Unicorn Riot reporting on 2025 data).

In 2025, Sheriff Joel Brott sought to layer a 287(g) Jail Enforcement Model (JEM) agreement onto the existing IGSA. JEM allows jail staff to interrogate immigration status of inmates and hold them up to 48 hours on civil detainers — a meaningful expansion of authority beyond the IGSA’s “house federal detainees” function. The Minnesota Reformer (Nov 7, 2025) listed Sherburne among the 8 MN counties with 287(g) agreements (Cass, Crow Wing, Freeborn, Itasca, Jackson, Kandiyohi, Mille Lacs, Sherburne).

The application was paused after AG Keith Ellison’s December 12, 2025 legal opinion holding that Minnesota sheriffs cannot enter 287(g) agreements unilaterally — the authority sits with county boards. Brott has publicly said he will wait for the lawsuits in other MN counties (notably ACLU-MN’s Freeborn injunction) to resolve, then “proceed while complying with any resulting rulings.”

Timeline

2006-onward — Sherburne County Jail operates under IGSA with ICE; 19-year average of 131 detainees/day; revenue regularly exceeds $10M/year (Unicorn Riot: $11.6M ICE peak in 2019; $18M total federal reimbursements 2024).
October 2025 — Sherburne signs/joins 287(g) Jail Enforcement Model (per multiple search summaries citing Reformer / Unicorn Riot tracking).
November 7, 2025 — Minnesota Reformer publishes “Eight Minnesota counties have signed agreements with ICE,” listing Sherburne alongside Cass, Crow Wing, Freeborn, Itasca, Jackson, Kandiyohi, Mille Lacs.
December 12, 2025 — AG Ellison issues formal opinion: only county boards (not sheriffs) can authorize 287(g) agreements under Minnesota law.
Post-Dec 12, 2025 — Sheriff Brott publicly states the JEM application is paused pending resolution of legal challenges.
January 16, 2026 — Court grants ACLU-MN preliminary injunction against Freeborn County’s 287(g). Sherburne does not move to rescind.
January 20, 2026 — Sherburne County Board workshop. Commissioner Gregg Felber (District 3) urges the board to consider: (1) adopting 287(g) once legal hurdles clear, (2) passing a resolution committing the county to assist ICE enforcement, (3) implementing verification processes against undocumented immigrants receiving county services. Felber: “I think every time someone who is here illegally gets a service, it’s a theft from the taxpayers.” County attorney warns the workshop discussion risks violating Minnesota open-meeting law; County Administrator Bruce Messelt warns of legal risk and enforcement complexity. Felber retracts both questions. Commissioner Andrew Hulse also present; no other commissioner proposed action.
February 22, 2026 — Elk River Star News publishes “Amid scrutiny, Sherburne County sheriff explains ICE cooperation” — Brott reiterates that 287(g) “would not affect 99.9% of incidents” because the county already notifies ICE on inmates with detainers.
March 8, 2026 — ~50 people rally at Sherburne County Sheriff’s Office demanding the county cut ICE ties. Organized by Sanctuary and Resistance to Injustice (SARI) with ICOM, MIRAC, FIRM-MN, and others.
Ongoing — SARI holds weekly Wednesday afternoon vigils outside the jail; ICOM runs an “End I.C.E. Detention in Sherburne County” campaign.

Key Actors

Sheriff Joel Brott — pursued JEM, paused after AG opinion, publicly defends existing cooperation.
Commissioner Gregg Felber (District 3, Becker) — pro-ICE board hawk; requested Jan 2026 workshop; later retracted formal motions.
Commissioner Andrew Hulse — present at workshop; no public position recorded.
Commissioner Gary Gray (District 4) — running for re-election 2026; no public ICE position recorded.
County Administrator Bruce Messelt — flagged legal/enforcement risk on Felber’s verification proposals.
County Attorney (unnamed in source) — warned that workshop discussion of 287(g) risked open-meeting-law violation.
AG Keith Ellison — Dec 12, 2025 opinion is the legal lever.
SARI / ICOM / MIRAC / FIRM-MN — sustained organizing presence.

Cross-reference: sibling-mechanism candidate — elected-sheriff unilateral action vs. county board

Sherburne fits the same MN-cluster pattern flagged in the Crow Wing entry and the new unilateral-elected-officer-vs-board-governance-capture.md mechanism — but with a softer expression. Like Crow Wing, Freeborn, Cass, Itasca, Jackson, Kandiyohi, and Mille Lacs, Sherburne’s 287(g) was pursued at the sheriff’s initiative without prior board authorization, and the AG’s Dec 12, 2025 opinion explicitly says only the board can sign.

The Sherburne variant looks closest to the Crow Wing (political-inaction-despite-authority) sub-pattern: the board has the legal authority post-Ellison opinion, the JEM is paused but not rescinded, and the only formal board engagement (Jan 20, 2026 workshop) was a pro-ICE commissioner pushing to ratify rather than nullify — and even that was procedurally walked back. Difference: Sherburne adds a major-detention-site financial dimension (long-running IGSA generating $10M+/yr) that the smaller northern counties lack, raising the stakes for any board move to rescind. Confirms the MN-cluster pattern; reinforces 3+ instances criterion already triggered by Crow Wing tick.

Why This Fight Matters

Sherburne is structurally different from the rest of the MN 287(g) cluster: it is the statewide ICE detention hub, not a small-county detainer-cooperation site. A board decision either way — to rescind the JEM under AG-opinion authority, or to ratify it — would have multi-county consequences because Twin Cities ICE arrests are routinely transported to Sherburne. The combination of (a) MN’s largest ICE bedspace, (b) an actively pro-ICE commissioner (Felber) maneuvering inside open-meeting constraints, (c) sustained on-the-ground organizing (SARI weekly vigils, ICOM campaign), and (d) the unresolved AG-opinion question makes Sherburne a high-leverage site to watch through 2026.

Sources

This research is published at The RAMM — investigative reporting on the detention pipeline.

Edit Report issue County profile Add a tip about this fight