Start Here → Map Fights Pipeline Tactics Investigate Counties By State By Signal Type Timeline Players Network Facilities FOIA Generator Help Build Contribute Coverage Gaps Data Sources Develop Resources Methodology

Methodology

v1.0 · Last updated April 2026

This site visualizes signal convergence — the overlap of multiple independent indicators that a county is being targeted for ICE detention facility expansion. A single signal means little; multiple signal types in the same county indicate a pattern.

How the score works

Each county receives a heat score based on three components:

  1. Weighted signals: Each entry is scored by its signal type (see weights below). Higher weights mean more predictive signals.
  2. Per-type caps: Each signal type is capped so that, e.g., 20 287(g) entries don't outscore 1 IGSA + 1 commission vote. The cap limits how many entries of one type contribute.
  3. Convergence bonus: +10 points per signal type beyond 2, and +15 more if 5 or more types are present. This is the key insight: three different signal types in one county is far more predictive than ten entries of the same type.

Worked example: Broward County, FL (Score: 129)

IGSA facilities: 2 entries × weight 10 (cap 5)=20 ANC contracts: 3 entries × weight 8 (cap 3)=24 287(g) agreements: 3 entries × weight 7 (cap 3)=21 Job posting: 1 entry × weight 7 (cap 3)=7 Budget distress: 1 entry × weight 5 (cap 2)=5
Subtotal (5 types, weighted + capped)=77 Convergence: 5 types − 2 = 3 extra × 10=+30 5+ type bonus=+15 Total=122

Note: Actual score may vary slightly as the heat score script counts all entries with matching FIPS, including entries that may have been added since this example was written. View Broward County →

Signal types and weights

SignalWeightCapDescription
IGSA Facility105Existing Intergovernmental Service Agreement for ICE detention
ANC Contract83Alaska Native Corporation federal contract in detention/security
287(g) Agreement73Local law enforcement deputized for immigration enforcement
Commission Activity75County commission agenda item, vote, or hearing on detention
Job Posting73Detention consultant or contractor recruiting for this area
Sheriff Network63Sheriff conference attendance, pitch to commissioners
Comms Discipline63Polished messaging, NDA citations, opposition framing
Budget Distress52County budget shortfall making it vulnerable to the pitch
Real Estate Trace22Warehouse or county building that could be converted
Legislative Trace12State legislation to block or enable detention agreements

Coverage depth

Each county page shows a coverage badge indicating how thoroughly it has been investigated:

Automated signals only Only data from scripts (287(g), ANC contracts, IGSA, USDA budget data). No human has investigated.
Partially researched At least one human-written entry (commission activity, news coverage, investigative findings) plus automated data.
Well researched Two or more human-researched signal types. Multiple independent sources have been verified.

You can help move counties from "automated only" to "well researched" by investigating locally and submitting what you find. The FOIA request generator produces ready-to-send public records requests for any county.

The thesis

Detention consultants target counties with budget distress, cooperative sheriffs, and existing infrastructure. The pitch follows a playbook: sheriff conference recruitment, closed-session presentations, NDA-protected negotiations, then a commission vote framed as fiscal salvation.

This site surfaces the signals early — when multiple independent indicators converge on the same county, that county is likely being pitched. Early detection enables democratic response. See the county fights section for documented cases.

Data sources

SourceDataAccessedCount
Vera Institute of JusticeIGSA facilities, FIPS-codedMar 2026459
Prison Policy Initiative287(g) agreements, compiled from ICE dataFeb 17, 20261,311
USAspending.govANC subsidiary federal contracts (API)Apr 2026244
Legistar APICounty commission agendas and minutesOngoing3
USDA ERSCounty typology and economic distress indicatorsMar 202634
Public career pages, LinkedInDetention consultant job postingsOngoing6
Local news, FOIA, court recordsCommission activity, sheriff networks, comms patternsOngoing7
The RAMMInvestigative reporting on detention pipeline — contractor profiles, revolving door, warehouse purchasesOngoing
U.S. Census BureauCounty FIPS codes (2020)20203,235

Disclosure

This site is published by The RAMM. Some entries cite The RAMM's own investigative reporting as a source — these citations are marked "(publisher)" in the source list. All investigative findings cited are published and publicly accessible. Leaked documents referenced (e.g., the Sabot Consulting briefing package) were obtained and published by independent journalists; the KB entries cite the published articles, not the raw documents.

Limitations

This is an early-warning system, not a confirmed list. A high score means multiple independent signals converge — it does not mean a facility deal is confirmed or inevitable. False positives are expected. Some counties with active pipeline work may score low if their signals haven't been captured yet.

287(g) FIPS resolution covers ~79% of agencies. Municipal police departments (as opposed to county sheriffs) often can't be reliably mapped to counties without geocoding. ANC contract data depends on USAspending.gov's completeness. Commission activity and other human-researched signals are limited by contributor coverage — most counties have only automated signals.

Propose a methodology change View source on GitHub